All Foods

Milk (2% reduced fat) vs Whole Milk (3.5%)

Calories, macronutrients and nutrition facts compared side by side (per 100g).

Nutrition Comparison

Per 100gMilk (2% reduced fat)Whole Milk (3.5%)
Calories50kcal61kcal
Protein3.3g3.2g
Carbs4.8g4.8g
Fat1.9g3.3g
Fiber0g0g
Sugar4.8g4.8g
Sodium44mg43mg

Green marks the more favorable value (fewer calories/sugar/sodium, more protein/fiber).

Key Takeaways

  • Milk (2% reduced fat) has 11 fewer calories per 100g than Whole Milk (3.5%) (22% less).
  • Milk (2% reduced fat) delivers more protein (3.3g vs 3.2g per 100g).
  • Milk (2% reduced fat) contains less fat (1.9g vs 3.3g).

Milk (2% reduced fat)

Milk provides complete protein, calcium, vitamin D (when fortified), and vitamin B12 in one of the most bioavailable forms. The whey-casein protein blend supports muscle protein synthesis. Lactose-intolerant individuals can choose lactose-free or fermented alternatives like kefir or yogurt.

View Milk (2% reduced fat) nutrition →

Whole Milk (3.5%)

Whole milk supplies complete protein, calcium, vitamin B12 and (often fortified) vitamin D in a single package. Its 3.5% fat carries fat-soluble vitamins and adds satiety; skim and low-fat versions cut the calories but lose some of those vitamins unless fortified.

View Whole Milk (3.5%) nutrition →

Track Milk (2% reduced fat) & Whole Milk (3.5%) in Kairo

Just photograph it. Kairo's AI reads the portion and the nutrition. Three seconds later the calories and macros are in your log, no typing.

Get Kairo on the App Store

More Comparisons