Ground Beef (85% lean) vs Tuna (Canned in Water)
Calories, macronutrients and nutrition facts compared side by side (per 100g).
Ground Beef (85% lean)
per 100g
ProteinTuna (Canned in Water)
per 100g
Nutrition Comparison
| Per 100g | Ground Beef (85% lean) | Tuna (Canned in Water) |
|---|---|---|
| Calories | 215kcal | 116kcal |
| Protein | 18.6g | 25.5g |
| Carbs | 0g | 0g |
| Fat | 15g | 0.8g |
| Fiber | 0g | 0g |
| Sugar | 0g | 0g |
| Sodium | 66mg | 247mg |
Green marks the more favorable value (fewer calories/sugar/sodium, more protein/fiber).
Key Takeaways
- Tuna (Canned in Water) has 99 fewer calories per 100g than Ground Beef (85% lean) (85% less).
- Tuna (Canned in Water) delivers more protein (25.5g vs 18.6g per 100g).
- Tuna (Canned in Water) contains less fat (0.8g vs 15g).
Ground Beef (85% lean)
Ground beef is a complete-protein staple rich in iron, zinc, and vitamin B12, nutrients that are particularly bioavailable from red meat. Choosing 85% lean keeps saturated fat moderate while preserving flavor. Pair with vegetables and whole grains for balanced meals.
View Ground Beef (85% lean) nutrition →Tuna (Canned in Water)
Canned tuna is one of the most calorie-efficient protein sources: 25g of protein for just 116 kcal. It provides selenium, vitamin B12, and omega-3 fatty acids, though levels are lower than in fattier fish like salmon. Choose water-packed over oil-packed to keep calories down, and rotate with other fish to limit mercury exposure.
View Tuna (Canned in Water) nutrition →Track Ground Beef (85% lean) & Tuna (Canned in Water) in Kairo
Just photograph it. Kairo's AI reads the portion and the nutrition. Three seconds later the calories and macros are in your log, no typing.
Get Kairo on the App Store