All Foods

Chicken Breast vs Tuna (Canned in Water)

Calories, macronutrients and nutrition facts compared side by side (per 100g).

Nutrition Comparison

Per 100gChicken BreastTuna (Canned in Water)
Calories165kcal116kcal
Protein31g25.5g
Carbs0g0g
Fat3.6g0.8g
Fiber0g0g
Sugar0g0g
Sodium74mg247mg

Green marks the more favorable value (fewer calories/sugar/sodium, more protein/fiber).

Key Takeaways

  • Tuna (Canned in Water) has 49 fewer calories per 100g than Chicken Breast (42% less).
  • Chicken Breast delivers more protein (31g vs 25.5g per 100g).
  • Tuna (Canned in Water) contains less fat (0.8g vs 3.6g).

Chicken Breast

Chicken breast is one of the leanest and most protein-dense foods available. It is an excellent source of niacin (vitamin B3), selenium, and phosphorus. Skinless chicken breast is a staple in many fitness-oriented diets due to its high protein-to-calorie ratio.

View Chicken Breast nutrition →

Tuna (Canned in Water)

Canned tuna is one of the most calorie-efficient protein sources — 25g of protein for just 116 kcal. It provides selenium, vitamin B12, and omega-3 fatty acids, though levels are lower than in fattier fish like salmon. Choose water-packed over oil-packed to keep calories down, and rotate with other fish to limit mercury exposure.

View Tuna (Canned in Water) nutrition →

Track Chicken Breast & Tuna (Canned in Water) in Kairo

Scan your food with AI and automatically track calories and macros. No manual entry needed.

Try Kairo for free

More Comparisons