All Foods

Bacon (Cooked) vs Tuna (Canned in Water)

Calories, macronutrients and nutrition facts compared side by side (per 100g).

Nutrition Comparison

Per 100gBacon (Cooked)Tuna (Canned in Water)
Calories541kcal116kcal
Protein37g25.5g
Carbs1.4g0g
Fat42g0.8g
Fiber0g0g
Sugar0g0g
Sodium1717mg247mg

Green marks the more favorable value (fewer calories/sugar/sodium, more protein/fiber).

Key Takeaways

  • Tuna (Canned in Water) has 425 fewer calories per 100g than Bacon (Cooked) (366% less).
  • Bacon (Cooked) delivers more protein (37g vs 25.5g per 100g).
  • Tuna (Canned in Water) contains less fat (0.8g vs 42g).

Bacon (Cooked)

Bacon is high in protein but also very high in saturated fat and sodium, and it is a processed meat the WHO classifies as carcinogenic in large regular amounts. Used in small quantities for flavor it fits a balanced diet; daily large servings do not.

View Bacon (Cooked) nutrition →

Tuna (Canned in Water)

Canned tuna is one of the most calorie-efficient protein sources — 25g of protein for just 116 kcal. It provides selenium, vitamin B12, and omega-3 fatty acids, though levels are lower than in fattier fish like salmon. Choose water-packed over oil-packed to keep calories down, and rotate with other fish to limit mercury exposure.

View Tuna (Canned in Water) nutrition →

Track Bacon (Cooked) & Tuna (Canned in Water) in Kairo

Scan your food with AI and automatically track calories and macros. No manual entry needed.

Try Kairo for free

More Comparisons