Bacon (Cooked) vs Tuna (Canned in Water)
Calories, macronutrients and nutrition facts compared side by side (per 100g).
Bacon (Cooked)
per 100g
ProteinTuna (Canned in Water)
per 100g
Nutrition Comparison
| Per 100g | Bacon (Cooked) | Tuna (Canned in Water) |
|---|---|---|
| Calories | 541kcal | 116kcal |
| Protein | 37g | 25.5g |
| Carbs | 1.4g | 0g |
| Fat | 42g | 0.8g |
| Fiber | 0g | 0g |
| Sugar | 0g | 0g |
| Sodium | 1717mg | 247mg |
Green marks the more favorable value (fewer calories/sugar/sodium, more protein/fiber).
Key Takeaways
- Tuna (Canned in Water) has 425 fewer calories per 100g than Bacon (Cooked) (366% less).
- Bacon (Cooked) delivers more protein (37g vs 25.5g per 100g).
- Tuna (Canned in Water) contains less fat (0.8g vs 42g).
Bacon (Cooked)
Bacon is high in protein but also very high in saturated fat and sodium, and it is a processed meat the WHO classifies as carcinogenic in large regular amounts. Used in small quantities for flavor it fits a balanced diet; daily large servings do not.
View Bacon (Cooked) nutrition →Tuna (Canned in Water)
Canned tuna is one of the most calorie-efficient protein sources — 25g of protein for just 116 kcal. It provides selenium, vitamin B12, and omega-3 fatty acids, though levels are lower than in fattier fish like salmon. Choose water-packed over oil-packed to keep calories down, and rotate with other fish to limit mercury exposure.
View Tuna (Canned in Water) nutrition →Track Bacon (Cooked) & Tuna (Canned in Water) in Kairo
Scan your food with AI and automatically track calories and macros. No manual entry needed.
Try Kairo for free