All Foods

Couscous (cooked) vs Quinoa (Cooked)

Calories, macronutrients and nutrition facts compared side by side (per 100g).

Nutrition Comparison

Per 100gCouscous (cooked)Quinoa (Cooked)
Calories112kcal120kcal
Protein3.8g4.4g
Carbs23.2g21.3g
Fat0.2g1.9g
Fiber1.4g2.8g
Sugar0.1g0.9g
Sodium5mg7mg

Green marks the more favorable value (fewer calories/sugar/sodium, more protein/fiber).

Key Takeaways

  • Couscous (cooked) has 8 fewer calories per 100g than Quinoa (Cooked) (7% less).
  • Quinoa (Cooked) delivers more protein (4.4g vs 3.8g per 100g).
  • Quinoa (Cooked) has more fiber (2.8g vs 1.4g).
  • Couscous (cooked) contains less fat (0.2g vs 1.9g).
  • Couscous (cooked) has less sugar (0.1g vs 0.9g).

Couscous (cooked)

Couscous is small steamed semolina pasta — quick to prepare and lighter in calorie density than dry pasta. It offers modest protein and a similar carbohydrate profile to white pasta. Whole-wheat couscous adds fiber and B vitamins.

View Couscous (cooked) nutrition →

Quinoa (Cooked)

Quinoa is a pseudo-cereal that is one of the few plant foods containing all nine essential amino acids, making it a complete protein source. It is naturally gluten-free and rich in manganese, magnesium, phosphorus, and folate. Its high fiber and protein content make it especially satiating compared to other grains.

View Quinoa (Cooked) nutrition →

Track Couscous (cooked) & Quinoa (Cooked) in Kairo

Scan your food with AI and automatically track calories and macros. No manual entry needed.

Try Kairo for free

More Comparisons