Bulgur (Cooked) vs Quinoa (Cooked)
Calories, macronutrients and nutrition facts compared side by side (per 100g).
Nutrition Comparison
| Per 100g | Bulgur (Cooked) | Quinoa (Cooked) |
|---|---|---|
| Calories | 83kcal | 120kcal |
| Protein | 3.1g | 4.4g |
| Carbs | 18.6g | 21.3g |
| Fat | 0.2g | 1.9g |
| Fiber | 4.5g | 2.8g |
| Sugar | 0.1g | 0.9g |
| Sodium | 5mg | 7mg |
Green marks the more favorable value (fewer calories/sugar/sodium, more protein/fiber).
Key Takeaways
- Bulgur (Cooked) has 37 fewer calories per 100g than Quinoa (Cooked) (45% less).
- Quinoa (Cooked) delivers more protein (4.4g vs 3.1g per 100g).
- Bulgur (Cooked) has more fiber (4.5g vs 2.8g).
- Bulgur (Cooked) contains less fat (0.2g vs 1.9g).
- Bulgur (Cooked) has less sugar (0.1g vs 0.9g).
Bulgur (Cooked)
Bulgur is parboiled cracked wheat — quick to cook and notably high in fiber for its low calorie count. It provides plant protein, manganese and magnesium, and is the traditional base of tabbouleh.
View Bulgur (Cooked) nutrition →Quinoa (Cooked)
Quinoa is a pseudo-cereal that is one of the few plant foods containing all nine essential amino acids, making it a complete protein source. It is naturally gluten-free and rich in manganese, magnesium, phosphorus, and folate. Its high fiber and protein content make it especially satiating compared to other grains.
View Quinoa (Cooked) nutrition →Track Bulgur (Cooked) & Quinoa (Cooked) in Kairo
Scan your food with AI and automatically track calories and macros. No manual entry needed.
Try Kairo for free