All Foods
Bulgur (Cooked) vs Couscous (cooked)
Calories, macronutrients and nutrition facts compared side by side (per 100g).
Nutrition Comparison
| Per 100g | Bulgur (Cooked) | Couscous (cooked) |
|---|---|---|
| Calories | 83kcal | 112kcal |
| Protein | 3.1g | 3.8g |
| Carbs | 18.6g | 23.2g |
| Fat | 0.2g | 0.2g |
| Fiber | 4.5g | 1.4g |
| Sugar | 0.1g | 0.1g |
| Sodium | 5mg | 5mg |
Green marks the more favorable value (fewer calories/sugar/sodium, more protein/fiber).
Key Takeaways
- Bulgur (Cooked) has 29 fewer calories per 100g than Couscous (cooked) (35% less).
- Couscous (cooked) delivers more protein (3.8g vs 3.1g per 100g).
- Bulgur (Cooked) has more fiber (4.5g vs 1.4g).
Bulgur (Cooked)
Bulgur is parboiled cracked wheat — quick to cook and notably high in fiber for its low calorie count. It provides plant protein, manganese and magnesium, and is the traditional base of tabbouleh.
View Bulgur (Cooked) nutrition →Couscous (cooked)
Couscous is small steamed semolina pasta — quick to prepare and lighter in calorie density than dry pasta. It offers modest protein and a similar carbohydrate profile to white pasta. Whole-wheat couscous adds fiber and B vitamins.
View Couscous (cooked) nutrition →Track Bulgur (Cooked) & Couscous (cooked) in Kairo
Scan your food with AI and automatically track calories and macros. No manual entry needed.
Try Kairo for free