Cornflakes vs Couscous (cooked)
Calories, macronutrients and nutrition facts compared side by side (per 100g).
Nutrition Comparison
| Per 100g | Cornflakes | Couscous (cooked) |
|---|---|---|
| Calories | 357kcal | 112kcal |
| Protein | 7.5g | 3.8g |
| Carbs | 84g | 23.2g |
| Fat | 0.4g | 0.2g |
| Fiber | 3g | 1.4g |
| Sugar | 8g | 0.1g |
| Sodium | 729mg | 5mg |
Green marks the more favorable value (fewer calories/sugar/sodium, more protein/fiber).
Key Takeaways
- Couscous (cooked) has 245 fewer calories per 100g than Cornflakes (219% less).
- Cornflakes delivers more protein (7.5g vs 3.8g per 100g).
- Cornflakes has more fiber (3g vs 1.4g).
- Couscous (cooked) contains less fat (0.2g vs 0.4g).
- Couscous (cooked) has less sugar (0.1g vs 8g).
Cornflakes
Cornflakes are a low-fat but highly refined breakfast cereal with a high glycemic index, so they spike blood sugar quickly. Most brands are fortified with B vitamins and iron, but they are low in fiber and protein on their own.
View Cornflakes nutrition →Couscous (cooked)
Couscous is small steamed semolina pasta, quick to prepare and lighter in calorie density than dry pasta. It offers modest protein and a similar carbohydrate profile to white pasta. Whole-wheat couscous adds fiber and B vitamins.
View Couscous (cooked) nutrition →Track Cornflakes & Couscous (cooked) in Kairo
Just photograph it. Kairo's AI reads the portion and the nutrition. Three seconds later the calories and macros are in your log, no typing.
Get Kairo on the App Store