All Foods
Bulgur (Cooked) vs Pasta (cooked)
Calories, macronutrients and nutrition facts compared side by side (per 100g).
Nutrition Comparison
| Per 100g | Bulgur (Cooked) | Pasta (cooked) |
|---|---|---|
| Calories | 83kcal | 131kcal |
| Protein | 3.1g | 5g |
| Carbs | 18.6g | 25g |
| Fat | 0.2g | 1.1g |
| Fiber | 4.5g | 1.8g |
| Sugar | 0.1g | 0.6g |
| Sodium | 5mg | 1mg |
Green marks the more favorable value (fewer calories/sugar/sodium, more protein/fiber).
Key Takeaways
- Bulgur (Cooked) has 48 fewer calories per 100g than Pasta (cooked) (58% less).
- Pasta (cooked) delivers more protein (5g vs 3.1g per 100g).
- Bulgur (Cooked) has more fiber (4.5g vs 1.8g).
- Bulgur (Cooked) contains less fat (0.2g vs 1.1g).
- Bulgur (Cooked) has less sugar (0.1g vs 0.6g).
Bulgur (Cooked)
Bulgur is parboiled cracked wheat — quick to cook and notably high in fiber for its low calorie count. It provides plant protein, manganese and magnesium, and is the traditional base of tabbouleh.
View Bulgur (Cooked) nutrition →Pasta (cooked)
Cooked pasta contains roughly a third of the calories of dry pasta because of water absorption — easy to misjudge when tracking. It provides slow-releasing carbohydrates and modest protein. Whole-wheat varieties add 5–7g more fiber per 100g and have a lower glycemic impact.
View Pasta (cooked) nutrition →Track Bulgur (Cooked) & Pasta (cooked) in Kairo
Scan your food with AI and automatically track calories and macros. No manual entry needed.
Try Kairo for free