Pasta (cooked) vs Quinoa (Cooked)
Calories, macronutrients and nutrition facts compared side by side (per 100g).
Nutrition Comparison
| Per 100g | Pasta (cooked) | Quinoa (Cooked) |
|---|---|---|
| Calories | 131kcal | 120kcal |
| Protein | 5g | 4.4g |
| Carbs | 25g | 21.3g |
| Fat | 1.1g | 1.9g |
| Fiber | 1.8g | 2.8g |
| Sugar | 0.6g | 0.9g |
| Sodium | 1mg | 7mg |
Green marks the more favorable value (fewer calories/sugar/sodium, more protein/fiber).
Key Takeaways
- Quinoa (Cooked) has 11 fewer calories per 100g than Pasta (cooked) (9% less).
- Pasta (cooked) delivers more protein (5g vs 4.4g per 100g).
- Quinoa (Cooked) has more fiber (2.8g vs 1.8g).
- Pasta (cooked) contains less fat (1.1g vs 1.9g).
- Pasta (cooked) has less sugar (0.6g vs 0.9g).
Pasta (cooked)
Cooked pasta contains roughly a third of the calories of dry pasta because of water absorption — easy to misjudge when tracking. It provides slow-releasing carbohydrates and modest protein. Whole-wheat varieties add 5–7g more fiber per 100g and have a lower glycemic impact.
View Pasta (cooked) nutrition →Quinoa (Cooked)
Quinoa is a pseudo-cereal that is one of the few plant foods containing all nine essential amino acids, making it a complete protein source. It is naturally gluten-free and rich in manganese, magnesium, phosphorus, and folate. Its high fiber and protein content make it especially satiating compared to other grains.
View Quinoa (Cooked) nutrition →Track Pasta (cooked) & Quinoa (Cooked) in Kairo
Scan your food with AI and automatically track calories and macros. No manual entry needed.
Try Kairo for free