Milk (2% reduced fat) vs Whole Milk (3.5%)
Calories, macronutrients and nutrition facts compared side by side (per 100g).
Milk (2% reduced fat)
per 100g
DairyWhole Milk (3.5%)
per 100g
Nutrition Comparison
| Per 100g | Milk (2% reduced fat) | Whole Milk (3.5%) |
|---|---|---|
| Calories | 50kcal | 61kcal |
| Protein | 3.3g | 3.2g |
| Carbs | 4.8g | 4.8g |
| Fat | 1.9g | 3.3g |
| Fiber | 0g | 0g |
| Sugar | 4.8g | 4.8g |
| Sodium | 44mg | 43mg |
Green marks the more favorable value (fewer calories/sugar/sodium, more protein/fiber).
Key Takeaways
- Milk (2% reduced fat) has 11 fewer calories per 100g than Whole Milk (3.5%) (22% less).
- Milk (2% reduced fat) delivers more protein (3.3g vs 3.2g per 100g).
- Milk (2% reduced fat) contains less fat (1.9g vs 3.3g).
Milk (2% reduced fat)
Milk provides complete protein, calcium, vitamin D (when fortified), and vitamin B12 in one of the most bioavailable forms. The whey-casein protein blend supports muscle protein synthesis. Lactose-intolerant individuals can choose lactose-free or fermented alternatives like kefir or yogurt.
View Milk (2% reduced fat) nutrition →Whole Milk (3.5%)
Whole milk supplies complete protein, calcium, vitamin B12 and (often fortified) vitamin D in a single package. Its 3.5% fat carries fat-soluble vitamins and adds satiety; skim and low-fat versions cut the calories but lose some of those vitamins unless fortified.
View Whole Milk (3.5%) nutrition →Track Milk (2% reduced fat) & Whole Milk (3.5%) in Kairo
Scan your food with AI and automatically track calories and macros. No manual entry needed.
Try Kairo for free