All Foods
Ham (Lean, Cooked) vs Tilapia (Cooked)
Calories, macronutrients and nutrition facts compared side by side (per 100g).
Protein
Ham (Lean, Cooked)
145 kcal20.9g Protein
per 100g
ProteinTilapia (Cooked)
128 kcal26.2g Protein
per 100g
Nutrition Comparison
| Per 100g | Ham (Lean, Cooked) | Tilapia (Cooked) |
|---|---|---|
| Calories | 145kcal | 128kcal |
| Protein | 20.9g | 26.2g |
| Carbs | 1.5g | 0g |
| Fat | 5.5g | 2.7g |
| Fiber | 0g | 0g |
| Sugar | 0g | 0g |
| Sodium | 1203mg | 56mg |
Green marks the more favorable value (fewer calories/sugar/sodium, more protein/fiber).
Key Takeaways
- Tilapia (Cooked) has 17 fewer calories per 100g than Ham (Lean, Cooked) (13% less).
- Tilapia (Cooked) delivers more protein (26.2g vs 20.9g per 100g).
- Tilapia (Cooked) contains less fat (2.7g vs 5.5g).
Ham (Lean, Cooked)
Lean ham is a convenient high-protein, low-fat deli meat, but as a cured and processed product it is very high in sodium. Choose lower-sodium versions and treat it as an occasional rather than daily protein.
View Ham (Lean, Cooked) nutrition →Tilapia (Cooked)
Tilapia is a very lean white fish — high in protein with little fat, plus selenium, vitamin B12 and niacin. It contains less omega-3 than fatty fish like salmon, but it is mild, affordable and quick to cook.
View Tilapia (Cooked) nutrition →Track Ham (Lean, Cooked) & Tilapia (Cooked) in Kairo
Scan your food with AI and automatically track calories and macros. No manual entry needed.
Try Kairo for free