All Foods
Ground Beef (85% lean) vs Ham (Lean, Cooked)
Calories, macronutrients and nutrition facts compared side by side (per 100g).
Protein
Ground Beef (85% lean)
215 kcal18.6g Protein
per 100g
ProteinHam (Lean, Cooked)
145 kcal20.9g Protein
per 100g
Nutrition Comparison
| Per 100g | Ground Beef (85% lean) | Ham (Lean, Cooked) |
|---|---|---|
| Calories | 215kcal | 145kcal |
| Protein | 18.6g | 20.9g |
| Carbs | 0g | 1.5g |
| Fat | 15g | 5.5g |
| Fiber | 0g | 0g |
| Sugar | 0g | 0g |
| Sodium | 66mg | 1203mg |
Green marks the more favorable value (fewer calories/sugar/sodium, more protein/fiber).
Key Takeaways
- Ham (Lean, Cooked) has 70 fewer calories per 100g than Ground Beef (85% lean) (48% less).
- Ham (Lean, Cooked) delivers more protein (20.9g vs 18.6g per 100g).
- Ham (Lean, Cooked) contains less fat (5.5g vs 15g).
Ground Beef (85% lean)
Ground beef is a complete-protein staple rich in iron, zinc, and vitamin B12 — nutrients that are particularly bioavailable from red meat. Choosing 85% lean keeps saturated fat moderate while preserving flavor. Pair with vegetables and whole grains for balanced meals.
View Ground Beef (85% lean) nutrition →Ham (Lean, Cooked)
Lean ham is a convenient high-protein, low-fat deli meat, but as a cured and processed product it is very high in sodium. Choose lower-sodium versions and treat it as an occasional rather than daily protein.
View Ham (Lean, Cooked) nutrition →Track Ground Beef (85% lean) & Ham (Lean, Cooked) in Kairo
Scan your food with AI and automatically track calories and macros. No manual entry needed.
Try Kairo for freeMore Comparisons
Bacon (Cooked) vs Ground Beef (85% lean)Bacon (Cooked) vs Ham (Lean, Cooked)Chicken Breast vs Ground Beef (85% lean)Chicken Breast vs Ham (Lean, Cooked)Chicken Thigh (Cooked, Skinless) vs Ground Beef (85% lean)Chicken Thigh (Cooked, Skinless) vs Ham (Lean, Cooked)Cod vs Ground Beef (85% lean)Cod vs Ham (Lean, Cooked)