Tuna (Canned in Water) vs Turkey Breast (skinless)
Calories, macronutrients and nutrition facts compared side by side (per 100g).
Tuna (Canned in Water)
per 100g
ProteinTurkey Breast (skinless)
per 100g
Nutrition Comparison
| Per 100g | Tuna (Canned in Water) | Turkey Breast (skinless) |
|---|---|---|
| Calories | 116kcal | 135kcal |
| Protein | 25.5g | 30.1g |
| Carbs | 0g | 0g |
| Fat | 0.8g | 0.7g |
| Fiber | 0g | 0g |
| Sugar | 0g | 0g |
| Sodium | 247mg | 54mg |
Green marks the more favorable value (fewer calories/sugar/sodium, more protein/fiber).
Key Takeaways
- Tuna (Canned in Water) has 19 fewer calories per 100g than Turkey Breast (skinless) (16% less).
- Turkey Breast (skinless) delivers more protein (30.1g vs 25.5g per 100g).
- Turkey Breast (skinless) contains less fat (0.7g vs 0.8g).
Tuna (Canned in Water)
Canned tuna is one of the most calorie-efficient protein sources — 25g of protein for just 116 kcal. It provides selenium, vitamin B12, and omega-3 fatty acids, though levels are lower than in fattier fish like salmon. Choose water-packed over oil-packed to keep calories down, and rotate with other fish to limit mercury exposure.
View Tuna (Canned in Water) nutrition →Turkey Breast (skinless)
Turkey breast is one of the leanest protein sources available — 30g of protein with less than 1g of fat per 100g. It supplies high-quality protein along with selenium, niacin, and vitamin B6. The low fat content keeps calorie density very low, making it ideal during cuts.
View Turkey Breast (skinless) nutrition →Track Tuna (Canned in Water) & Turkey Breast (skinless) in Kairo
Scan your food with AI and automatically track calories and macros. No manual entry needed.
Try Kairo for free