All Foods

Salmon (Atlantic, Raw) vs Tuna (Canned in Water)

Calories, macronutrients and nutrition facts compared side by side (per 100g).

Nutrition Comparison

Per 100gSalmon (Atlantic, Raw)Tuna (Canned in Water)
Calories208kcal116kcal
Protein20.4g25.5g
Carbs0g0g
Fat13.4g0.8g
Fiber0g0g
Sugar0g0g
Sodium59mg247mg

Green marks the more favorable value (fewer calories/sugar/sodium, more protein/fiber).

Key Takeaways

  • Tuna (Canned in Water) has 92 fewer calories per 100g than Salmon (Atlantic, Raw) (79% less).
  • Tuna (Canned in Water) delivers more protein (25.5g vs 20.4g per 100g).
  • Tuna (Canned in Water) contains less fat (0.8g vs 13.4g).

Salmon (Atlantic, Raw)

Salmon is one of the best sources of omega-3 fatty acids (EPA and DHA), which are essential for brain function and heart health. It is also rich in high-quality protein, vitamin D, selenium, and B vitamins. The American Heart Association recommends eating fatty fish like salmon at least twice per week.

View Salmon (Atlantic, Raw) nutrition →

Tuna (Canned in Water)

Canned tuna is one of the most calorie-efficient protein sources — 25g of protein for just 116 kcal. It provides selenium, vitamin B12, and omega-3 fatty acids, though levels are lower than in fattier fish like salmon. Choose water-packed over oil-packed to keep calories down, and rotate with other fish to limit mercury exposure.

View Tuna (Canned in Water) nutrition →

Track Salmon (Atlantic, Raw) & Tuna (Canned in Water) in Kairo

Scan your food with AI and automatically track calories and macros. No manual entry needed.

Try Kairo for free

More Comparisons