All Foods

Ricotta (Whole Milk) vs Whole Milk (3.5%)

Calories, macronutrients and nutrition facts compared side by side (per 100g).

Nutrition Comparison

Per 100gRicotta (Whole Milk)Whole Milk (3.5%)
Calories174kcal61kcal
Protein11.3g3.2g
Carbs3g4.8g
Fat13g3.3g
Fiber0g0g
Sugar0.3g4.8g
Sodium84mg43mg

Green marks the more favorable value (fewer calories/sugar/sodium, more protein/fiber).

Key Takeaways

  • Whole Milk (3.5%) has 113 fewer calories per 100g than Ricotta (Whole Milk) (185% less).
  • Ricotta (Whole Milk) delivers more protein (11.3g vs 3.2g per 100g).
  • Whole Milk (3.5%) contains less fat (3.3g vs 13g).
  • Ricotta (Whole Milk) has less sugar (0.3g vs 4.8g).

Ricotta (Whole Milk)

Ricotta is made from whey, giving it a soft texture and a good protein-to-calorie ratio with notable calcium. It is lower in sodium than most cheeses, which makes it versatile in both savory and sweet dishes.

View Ricotta (Whole Milk) nutrition →

Whole Milk (3.5%)

Whole milk supplies complete protein, calcium, vitamin B12 and (often fortified) vitamin D in a single package. Its 3.5% fat carries fat-soluble vitamins and adds satiety; skim and low-fat versions cut the calories but lose some of those vitamins unless fortified.

View Whole Milk (3.5%) nutrition →

Track Ricotta (Whole Milk) & Whole Milk (3.5%) in Kairo

Scan your food with AI and automatically track calories and macros. No manual entry needed.

Try Kairo for free

More Comparisons