Chickpeas (cooked) vs Hummus
Calories, macronutrients and nutrition facts compared side by side (per 100g).
Nutrition Comparison
| Per 100g | Chickpeas (cooked) | Hummus |
|---|---|---|
| Calories | 164kcal | 166kcal |
| Protein | 8.9g | 7.9g |
| Carbs | 27.4g | 14.3g |
| Fat | 2.6g | 9.6g |
| Fiber | 7.6g | 6g |
| Sugar | 4.8g | 0.4g |
| Sodium | 7mg | 379mg |
Green marks the more favorable value (fewer calories/sugar/sodium, more protein/fiber).
Key Takeaways
- Chickpeas (cooked) has 2 fewer calories per 100g than Hummus (1% less).
- Chickpeas (cooked) delivers more protein (8.9g vs 7.9g per 100g).
- Chickpeas (cooked) has more fiber (7.6g vs 6g).
- Chickpeas (cooked) contains less fat (2.6g vs 9.6g).
- Hummus has less sugar (0.4g vs 4.8g).
Chickpeas (cooked)
Chickpeas are a powerhouse plant protein, pairing 9g of protein with 7.6g of fiber per 100g. The combination keeps you full longer than most carbohydrate sources. They are rich in folate, manganese, and iron, and form the base of hummus, falafel, and many Mediterranean dishes.
View Chickpeas (cooked) nutrition →Hummus
Hummus blends chickpeas with tahini, olive oil and lemon, combining plant protein and fiber with heart-healthy unsaturated fats. It is a more nutrient-dense dip than most, though the added oil and tahini raise its calorie count.
View Hummus nutrition →Track Chickpeas (cooked) & Hummus in Kairo
Scan your food with AI and automatically track calories and macros. No manual entry needed.
Try Kairo for free