Chickpeas (cooked) vs Edamame
Calories, macronutrients and nutrition facts compared side by side (per 100g).
Nutrition Comparison
| Per 100g | Chickpeas (cooked) | Edamame |
|---|---|---|
| Calories | 164kcal | 121kcal |
| Protein | 8.9g | 11.9g |
| Carbs | 27.4g | 8.9g |
| Fat | 2.6g | 5.2g |
| Fiber | 7.6g | 5.2g |
| Sugar | 4.8g | 2.2g |
| Sodium | 7mg | 6mg |
Green marks the more favorable value (fewer calories/sugar/sodium, more protein/fiber).
Key Takeaways
- Edamame has 43 fewer calories per 100g than Chickpeas (cooked) (36% less).
- Edamame delivers more protein (11.9g vs 8.9g per 100g).
- Chickpeas (cooked) has more fiber (7.6g vs 5.2g).
- Chickpeas (cooked) contains less fat (2.6g vs 5.2g).
- Edamame has less sugar (2.2g vs 4.8g).
Chickpeas (cooked)
Chickpeas are a powerhouse plant protein, pairing 9g of protein with 7.6g of fiber per 100g. The combination keeps you full longer than most carbohydrate sources. They are rich in folate, manganese, and iron, and form the base of hummus, falafel, and many Mediterranean dishes.
View Chickpeas (cooked) nutrition →Edamame
Edamame — young soybeans — is one of the few plant foods with a complete amino acid profile. It packs nearly 12g of protein and 5g of fiber per 100g, plus folate, vitamin K, and iron. Its low calorie density makes it a strong satiating snack.
View Edamame nutrition →Track Chickpeas (cooked) & Edamame in Kairo
Scan your food with AI and automatically track calories and macros. No manual entry needed.
Try Kairo for free