Chicken Breast vs Tuna (Canned in Water)
Calories, macronutrients and nutrition facts compared side by side (per 100g).
Chicken Breast
per 100g
ProteinTuna (Canned in Water)
per 100g
Nutrition Comparison
| Per 100g | Chicken Breast | Tuna (Canned in Water) |
|---|---|---|
| Calories | 165kcal | 116kcal |
| Protein | 31g | 25.5g |
| Carbs | 0g | 0g |
| Fat | 3.6g | 0.8g |
| Fiber | 0g | 0g |
| Sugar | 0g | 0g |
| Sodium | 74mg | 247mg |
Green marks the more favorable value (fewer calories/sugar/sodium, more protein/fiber).
Key Takeaways
- Tuna (Canned in Water) has 49 fewer calories per 100g than Chicken Breast (42% less).
- Chicken Breast delivers more protein (31g vs 25.5g per 100g).
- Tuna (Canned in Water) contains less fat (0.8g vs 3.6g).
Chicken Breast
Chicken breast is one of the leanest and most protein-dense foods available. It is an excellent source of niacin (vitamin B3), selenium, and phosphorus. Skinless chicken breast is a staple in many fitness-oriented diets due to its high protein-to-calorie ratio.
View Chicken Breast nutrition →Tuna (Canned in Water)
Canned tuna is one of the most calorie-efficient protein sources — 25g of protein for just 116 kcal. It provides selenium, vitamin B12, and omega-3 fatty acids, though levels are lower than in fattier fish like salmon. Choose water-packed over oil-packed to keep calories down, and rotate with other fish to limit mercury exposure.
View Tuna (Canned in Water) nutrition →Track Chicken Breast & Tuna (Canned in Water) in Kairo
Scan your food with AI and automatically track calories and macros. No manual entry needed.
Try Kairo for free