All Foods

Ground Beef (85% lean) vs Tuna (Canned in Water)

Calories, macronutrients and nutrition facts compared side by side (per 100g).

Nutrition Comparison

Per 100gGround Beef (85% lean)Tuna (Canned in Water)
Calories215kcal116kcal
Protein18.6g25.5g
Carbs0g0g
Fat15g0.8g
Fiber0g0g
Sugar0g0g
Sodium66mg247mg

Green marks the more favorable value (fewer calories/sugar/sodium, more protein/fiber).

Key Takeaways

  • Tuna (Canned in Water) has 99 fewer calories per 100g than Ground Beef (85% lean) (85% less).
  • Tuna (Canned in Water) delivers more protein (25.5g vs 18.6g per 100g).
  • Tuna (Canned in Water) contains less fat (0.8g vs 15g).

Ground Beef (85% lean)

Ground beef is a complete-protein staple rich in iron, zinc, and vitamin B12 — nutrients that are particularly bioavailable from red meat. Choosing 85% lean keeps saturated fat moderate while preserving flavor. Pair with vegetables and whole grains for balanced meals.

View Ground Beef (85% lean) nutrition →

Tuna (Canned in Water)

Canned tuna is one of the most calorie-efficient protein sources — 25g of protein for just 116 kcal. It provides selenium, vitamin B12, and omega-3 fatty acids, though levels are lower than in fattier fish like salmon. Choose water-packed over oil-packed to keep calories down, and rotate with other fish to limit mercury exposure.

View Tuna (Canned in Water) nutrition →

Track Ground Beef (85% lean) & Tuna (Canned in Water) in Kairo

Scan your food with AI and automatically track calories and macros. No manual entry needed.

Try Kairo for free

More Comparisons