Ground Beef (85% lean) vs Tuna (Canned in Water)
Calories, macronutrients and nutrition facts compared side by side (per 100g).
Ground Beef (85% lean)
per 100g
ProteinTuna (Canned in Water)
per 100g
Nutrition Comparison
| Per 100g | Ground Beef (85% lean) | Tuna (Canned in Water) |
|---|---|---|
| Calories | 215kcal | 116kcal |
| Protein | 18.6g | 25.5g |
| Carbs | 0g | 0g |
| Fat | 15g | 0.8g |
| Fiber | 0g | 0g |
| Sugar | 0g | 0g |
| Sodium | 66mg | 247mg |
Green marks the more favorable value (fewer calories/sugar/sodium, more protein/fiber).
Key Takeaways
- Tuna (Canned in Water) has 99 fewer calories per 100g than Ground Beef (85% lean) (85% less).
- Tuna (Canned in Water) delivers more protein (25.5g vs 18.6g per 100g).
- Tuna (Canned in Water) contains less fat (0.8g vs 15g).
Ground Beef (85% lean)
Ground beef is a complete-protein staple rich in iron, zinc, and vitamin B12 — nutrients that are particularly bioavailable from red meat. Choosing 85% lean keeps saturated fat moderate while preserving flavor. Pair with vegetables and whole grains for balanced meals.
View Ground Beef (85% lean) nutrition →Tuna (Canned in Water)
Canned tuna is one of the most calorie-efficient protein sources — 25g of protein for just 116 kcal. It provides selenium, vitamin B12, and omega-3 fatty acids, though levels are lower than in fattier fish like salmon. Choose water-packed over oil-packed to keep calories down, and rotate with other fish to limit mercury exposure.
View Tuna (Canned in Water) nutrition →Track Ground Beef (85% lean) & Tuna (Canned in Water) in Kairo
Scan your food with AI and automatically track calories and macros. No manual entry needed.
Try Kairo for free