Cashews vs Pistachios
Calories, macronutrients and nutrition facts compared side by side (per 100g).
Nutrition Comparison
| Per 100g | Cashews | Pistachios |
|---|---|---|
| Calories | 553kcal | 560kcal |
| Protein | 18.2g | 20.2g |
| Carbs | 30.2g | 27.2g |
| Fat | 43.9g | 45.3g |
| Fiber | 3.3g | 10.6g |
| Sugar | 5.9g | 7.7g |
| Sodium | 12mg | 1mg |
Green marks the more favorable value (fewer calories/sugar/sodium, more protein/fiber).
Key Takeaways
- Cashews has 7 fewer calories per 100g than Pistachios (1% less).
- Pistachios delivers more protein (20.2g vs 18.2g per 100g).
- Pistachios has more fiber (10.6g vs 3.3g).
- Cashews contains less fat (43.9g vs 45.3g).
- Cashews has less sugar (5.9g vs 7.7g).
Cashews
Cashews are slightly lower in fat and higher in carbs than most tree nuts, giving them a creamier texture. They are excellent sources of copper, magnesium, and manganese, and supply mostly heart-friendly mono-unsaturated fat. Roasted-and-salted versions can quickly push sodium high.
View Cashews nutrition →Pistachios
Pistachios are among the highest-protein and highest-fiber nuts, with a favorable fat profile and antioxidants like lutein. Eating them in the shell naturally slows your pace, and the empty shells are a visual cue that can curb overeating.
View Pistachios nutrition →Track Cashews & Pistachios in Kairo
Scan your food with AI and automatically track calories and macros. No manual entry needed.
Try Kairo for free