Cashews vs Pistachios
Calories, macronutrients and nutrition facts compared side by side (per 100g).
Nutrition Comparison
| Per 100g | Cashews | Pistachios |
|---|---|---|
| Calories | 553kcal | 560kcal |
| Protein | 18.2g | 20.2g |
| Carbs | 30.2g | 27.2g |
| Fat | 43.9g | 45.3g |
| Fiber | 3.3g | 10.6g |
| Sugar | 5.9g | 7.7g |
| Sodium | 12mg | 1mg |
Green marks the more favorable value (fewer calories/sugar/sodium, more protein/fiber).
Key Takeaways
- Cashews has 7 fewer calories per 100g than Pistachios (1% less).
- Pistachios delivers more protein (20.2g vs 18.2g per 100g).
- Pistachios has more fiber (10.6g vs 3.3g).
- Cashews contains less fat (43.9g vs 45.3g).
- Cashews has less sugar (5.9g vs 7.7g).
Cashews
Cashews are slightly lower in fat and higher in carbs than most tree nuts, giving them a creamier texture. They are excellent sources of copper, magnesium, and manganese, and supply mostly heart-friendly mono-unsaturated fat. Roasted-and-salted versions can quickly push sodium high.
View Cashews nutrition →Pistachios
Pistachios are among the highest-protein and highest-fiber nuts, with a favorable fat profile and antioxidants like lutein. Eating them in the shell naturally slows your pace, and the empty shells are a visual cue that can curb overeating.
View Pistachios nutrition →Track Cashews & Pistachios in Kairo
Just photograph it. Kairo's AI reads the portion and the nutrition. Three seconds later the calories and macros are in your log, no typing.
Get Kairo on the App Store