All Foods

Tilapia (Cooked) vs Tuna (Canned in Water)

Calories, macronutrients and nutrition facts compared side by side (per 100g).

Nutrition Comparison

Per 100gTilapia (Cooked)Tuna (Canned in Water)
Calories128kcal116kcal
Protein26.2g25.5g
Carbs0g0g
Fat2.7g0.8g
Fiber0g0g
Sugar0g0g
Sodium56mg247mg

Green marks the more favorable value (fewer calories/sugar/sodium, more protein/fiber).

Key Takeaways

  • Tuna (Canned in Water) has 12 fewer calories per 100g than Tilapia (Cooked) (10% less).
  • Tilapia (Cooked) delivers more protein (26.2g vs 25.5g per 100g).
  • Tuna (Canned in Water) contains less fat (0.8g vs 2.7g).

Tilapia (Cooked)

Tilapia is a very lean white fish — high in protein with little fat, plus selenium, vitamin B12 and niacin. It contains less omega-3 than fatty fish like salmon, but it is mild, affordable and quick to cook.

View Tilapia (Cooked) nutrition →

Tuna (Canned in Water)

Canned tuna is one of the most calorie-efficient protein sources — 25g of protein for just 116 kcal. It provides selenium, vitamin B12, and omega-3 fatty acids, though levels are lower than in fattier fish like salmon. Choose water-packed over oil-packed to keep calories down, and rotate with other fish to limit mercury exposure.

View Tuna (Canned in Water) nutrition →

Track Tilapia (Cooked) & Tuna (Canned in Water) in Kairo

Scan your food with AI and automatically track calories and macros. No manual entry needed.

Try Kairo for free

More Comparisons