Pork Chop (Cooked) vs Shrimp
Calories, macronutrients and nutrition facts compared side by side (per 100g).
Nutrition Comparison
| Per 100g | Pork Chop (Cooked) | Shrimp |
|---|---|---|
| Calories | 231kcal | 99kcal |
| Protein | 25.7g | 24g |
| Carbs | 0g | 0.2g |
| Fat | 13.9g | 0.3g |
| Fiber | 0g | 0g |
| Sugar | 0g | 0g |
| Sodium | 62mg | 111mg |
Green marks the more favorable value (fewer calories/sugar/sodium, more protein/fiber).
Key Takeaways
- Shrimp has 132 fewer calories per 100g than Pork Chop (Cooked) (133% less).
- Pork Chop (Cooked) delivers more protein (25.7g vs 24g per 100g).
- Shrimp contains less fat (0.3g vs 13.9g).
Pork Chop (Cooked)
Pork chop is a lean-to-moderate protein source rich in thiamine (vitamin B1) — pork is one of the best dietary sources — plus selenium, zinc and B12. Trimming visible fat keeps the calorie count modest for its protein.
View Pork Chop (Cooked) nutrition →Shrimp
Shrimp pack 24g of protein into just 99 calories — among the most calorie-efficient animal proteins. They are rich in selenium, vitamin B12, and iodine, and provide astaxanthin, an antioxidant that gives them their pink color. Their cholesterol content is balanced by very low saturated fat.
View Shrimp nutrition →Track Pork Chop (Cooked) & Shrimp in Kairo
Scan your food with AI and automatically track calories and macros. No manual entry needed.
Try Kairo for free