Pork Chop (Cooked) vs Tuna (Canned in Water)
Calories, macronutrients and nutrition facts compared side by side (per 100g).
Pork Chop (Cooked)
per 100g
ProteinTuna (Canned in Water)
per 100g
Nutrition Comparison
| Per 100g | Pork Chop (Cooked) | Tuna (Canned in Water) |
|---|---|---|
| Calories | 231kcal | 116kcal |
| Protein | 25.7g | 25.5g |
| Carbs | 0g | 0g |
| Fat | 13.9g | 0.8g |
| Fiber | 0g | 0g |
| Sugar | 0g | 0g |
| Sodium | 62mg | 247mg |
Green marks the more favorable value (fewer calories/sugar/sodium, more protein/fiber).
Key Takeaways
- Tuna (Canned in Water) has 115 fewer calories per 100g than Pork Chop (Cooked) (99% less).
- Pork Chop (Cooked) delivers more protein (25.7g vs 25.5g per 100g).
- Tuna (Canned in Water) contains less fat (0.8g vs 13.9g).
Pork Chop (Cooked)
Pork chop is a lean-to-moderate protein source rich in thiamine (vitamin B1) — pork is one of the best dietary sources — plus selenium, zinc and B12. Trimming visible fat keeps the calorie count modest for its protein.
View Pork Chop (Cooked) nutrition →Tuna (Canned in Water)
Canned tuna is one of the most calorie-efficient protein sources — 25g of protein for just 116 kcal. It provides selenium, vitamin B12, and omega-3 fatty acids, though levels are lower than in fattier fish like salmon. Choose water-packed over oil-packed to keep calories down, and rotate with other fish to limit mercury exposure.
View Tuna (Canned in Water) nutrition →Track Pork Chop (Cooked) & Tuna (Canned in Water) in Kairo
Scan your food with AI and automatically track calories and macros. No manual entry needed.
Try Kairo for free