All Foods
Parmesan vs Whole Milk (3.5%)
Calories, macronutrients and nutrition facts compared side by side (per 100g).
Nutrition Comparison
| Per 100g | Parmesan | Whole Milk (3.5%) |
|---|---|---|
| Calories | 431kcal | 61kcal |
| Protein | 38.5g | 3.2g |
| Carbs | 4.1g | 4.8g |
| Fat | 29g | 3.3g |
| Fiber | 0g | 0g |
| Sugar | 0.9g | 4.8g |
| Sodium | 1602mg | 43mg |
Green marks the more favorable value (fewer calories/sugar/sodium, more protein/fiber).
Key Takeaways
- Whole Milk (3.5%) has 370 fewer calories per 100g than Parmesan (607% less).
- Parmesan delivers more protein (38.5g vs 3.2g per 100g).
- Whole Milk (3.5%) contains less fat (3.3g vs 29g).
- Parmesan has less sugar (0.9g vs 4.8g).
Parmesan
Parmesan is extremely protein- and calcium-dense thanks to its long aging, which also concentrates sodium. A little goes a long way — a tablespoon adds savory umami flavor for very few calories, so it is best used as a seasoning.
View Parmesan nutrition →Whole Milk (3.5%)
Whole milk supplies complete protein, calcium, vitamin B12 and (often fortified) vitamin D in a single package. Its 3.5% fat carries fat-soluble vitamins and adds satiety; skim and low-fat versions cut the calories but lose some of those vitamins unless fortified.
View Whole Milk (3.5%) nutrition →Track Parmesan & Whole Milk (3.5%) in Kairo
Scan your food with AI and automatically track calories and macros. No manual entry needed.
Try Kairo for free