All Foods

Ham (Lean, Cooked) vs Tuna (Canned in Water)

Calories, macronutrients and nutrition facts compared side by side (per 100g).

Nutrition Comparison

Per 100gHam (Lean, Cooked)Tuna (Canned in Water)
Calories145kcal116kcal
Protein20.9g25.5g
Carbs1.5g0g
Fat5.5g0.8g
Fiber0g0g
Sugar0g0g
Sodium1203mg247mg

Green marks the more favorable value (fewer calories/sugar/sodium, more protein/fiber).

Key Takeaways

  • Tuna (Canned in Water) has 29 fewer calories per 100g than Ham (Lean, Cooked) (25% less).
  • Tuna (Canned in Water) delivers more protein (25.5g vs 20.9g per 100g).
  • Tuna (Canned in Water) contains less fat (0.8g vs 5.5g).

Ham (Lean, Cooked)

Lean ham is a convenient high-protein, low-fat deli meat, but as a cured and processed product it is very high in sodium. Choose lower-sodium versions and treat it as an occasional rather than daily protein.

View Ham (Lean, Cooked) nutrition →

Tuna (Canned in Water)

Canned tuna is one of the most calorie-efficient protein sources — 25g of protein for just 116 kcal. It provides selenium, vitamin B12, and omega-3 fatty acids, though levels are lower than in fattier fish like salmon. Choose water-packed over oil-packed to keep calories down, and rotate with other fish to limit mercury exposure.

View Tuna (Canned in Water) nutrition →

Track Ham (Lean, Cooked) & Tuna (Canned in Water) in Kairo

Scan your food with AI and automatically track calories and macros. No manual entry needed.

Try Kairo for free

More Comparisons