Tilapia (Cooked) vs Tuna (Canned in Water)
Calories, macronutrients and nutrition facts compared side by side (per 100g).
Tilapia (Cooked)
per 100g
ProteinTuna (Canned in Water)
per 100g
Nutrition Comparison
| Per 100g | Tilapia (Cooked) | Tuna (Canned in Water) |
|---|---|---|
| Calories | 128kcal | 116kcal |
| Protein | 26.2g | 25.5g |
| Carbs | 0g | 0g |
| Fat | 2.7g | 0.8g |
| Fiber | 0g | 0g |
| Sugar | 0g | 0g |
| Sodium | 56mg | 247mg |
Green marks the more favorable value (fewer calories/sugar/sodium, more protein/fiber).
Key Takeaways
- Tuna (Canned in Water) has 12 fewer calories per 100g than Tilapia (Cooked) (10% less).
- Tilapia (Cooked) delivers more protein (26.2g vs 25.5g per 100g).
- Tuna (Canned in Water) contains less fat (0.8g vs 2.7g).
Tilapia (Cooked)
Tilapia is a very lean white fish — high in protein with little fat, plus selenium, vitamin B12 and niacin. It contains less omega-3 than fatty fish like salmon, but it is mild, affordable and quick to cook.
View Tilapia (Cooked) nutrition →Tuna (Canned in Water)
Canned tuna is one of the most calorie-efficient protein sources — 25g of protein for just 116 kcal. It provides selenium, vitamin B12, and omega-3 fatty acids, though levels are lower than in fattier fish like salmon. Choose water-packed over oil-packed to keep calories down, and rotate with other fish to limit mercury exposure.
View Tuna (Canned in Water) nutrition →Track Tilapia (Cooked) & Tuna (Canned in Water) in Kairo
Scan your food with AI and automatically track calories and macros. No manual entry needed.
Try Kairo for free