Shrimp vs Tuna (Canned in Water)
Calories, macronutrients and nutrition facts compared side by side (per 100g).
Nutrition Comparison
| Per 100g | Shrimp | Tuna (Canned in Water) |
|---|---|---|
| Calories | 99kcal | 116kcal |
| Protein | 24g | 25.5g |
| Carbs | 0.2g | 0g |
| Fat | 0.3g | 0.8g |
| Fiber | 0g | 0g |
| Sugar | 0g | 0g |
| Sodium | 111mg | 247mg |
Green marks the more favorable value (fewer calories/sugar/sodium, more protein/fiber).
Key Takeaways
- Shrimp has 17 fewer calories per 100g than Tuna (Canned in Water) (17% less).
- Tuna (Canned in Water) delivers more protein (25.5g vs 24g per 100g).
- Shrimp contains less fat (0.3g vs 0.8g).
Shrimp
Shrimp pack 24g of protein into just 99 calories — among the most calorie-efficient animal proteins. They are rich in selenium, vitamin B12, and iodine, and provide astaxanthin, an antioxidant that gives them their pink color. Their cholesterol content is balanced by very low saturated fat.
View Shrimp nutrition →Tuna (Canned in Water)
Canned tuna is one of the most calorie-efficient protein sources — 25g of protein for just 116 kcal. It provides selenium, vitamin B12, and omega-3 fatty acids, though levels are lower than in fattier fish like salmon. Choose water-packed over oil-packed to keep calories down, and rotate with other fish to limit mercury exposure.
View Tuna (Canned in Water) nutrition →Track Shrimp & Tuna (Canned in Water) in Kairo
Scan your food with AI and automatically track calories and macros. No manual entry needed.
Try Kairo for free