Egg (Whole, Hard-Boiled) vs Tuna (Canned in Water)
Calories, macronutrients and nutrition facts compared side by side (per 100g).
Egg (Whole, Hard-Boiled)
per 100g
ProteinTuna (Canned in Water)
per 100g
Nutrition Comparison
| Per 100g | Egg (Whole, Hard-Boiled) | Tuna (Canned in Water) |
|---|---|---|
| Calories | 155kcal | 116kcal |
| Protein | 12.6g | 25.5g |
| Carbs | 1.1g | 0g |
| Fat | 10.6g | 0.8g |
| Fiber | 0g | 0g |
| Sugar | 1.1g | 0g |
| Sodium | 124mg | 247mg |
Green marks the more favorable value (fewer calories/sugar/sodium, more protein/fiber).
Key Takeaways
- Tuna (Canned in Water) has 39 fewer calories per 100g than Egg (Whole, Hard-Boiled) (34% less).
- Tuna (Canned in Water) delivers more protein (25.5g vs 12.6g per 100g).
- Tuna (Canned in Water) contains less fat (0.8g vs 10.6g).
- Tuna (Canned in Water) has less sugar (0g vs 1.1g).
Egg (Whole, Hard-Boiled)
Eggs are one of the most nutrient-dense foods available, containing high-quality complete protein with all essential amino acids. They are rich in choline, which is vital for brain health, as well as vitamin D, B12, and selenium. The yolk contains lutein and zeaxanthin, antioxidants important for eye health.
View Egg (Whole, Hard-Boiled) nutrition →Tuna (Canned in Water)
Canned tuna is one of the most calorie-efficient protein sources — 25g of protein for just 116 kcal. It provides selenium, vitamin B12, and omega-3 fatty acids, though levels are lower than in fattier fish like salmon. Choose water-packed over oil-packed to keep calories down, and rotate with other fish to limit mercury exposure.
View Tuna (Canned in Water) nutrition →Track Egg (Whole, Hard-Boiled) & Tuna (Canned in Water) in Kairo
Scan your food with AI and automatically track calories and macros. No manual entry needed.
Try Kairo for free