Pasta (cooked) vs Sweet Potato (Baked)
Calories, macronutrients and nutrition facts compared side by side (per 100g).
Pasta (cooked)
per 100g
VegetablesSweet Potato (Baked)
per 100g
Nutrition Comparison
| Per 100g | Pasta (cooked) | Sweet Potato (Baked) |
|---|---|---|
| Calories | 131kcal | 90kcal |
| Protein | 5g | 2g |
| Carbs | 25g | 20.7g |
| Fat | 1.1g | 0.1g |
| Fiber | 1.8g | 3.3g |
| Sugar | 0.6g | 6.5g |
| Sodium | 1mg | 36mg |
Green marks the more favorable value (fewer calories/sugar/sodium, more protein/fiber).
Key Takeaways
- Sweet Potato (Baked) has 41 fewer calories per 100g than Pasta (cooked) (46% less).
- Pasta (cooked) delivers more protein (5g vs 2g per 100g).
- Sweet Potato (Baked) has more fiber (3.3g vs 1.8g).
- Sweet Potato (Baked) contains less fat (0.1g vs 1.1g).
- Pasta (cooked) has less sugar (0.6g vs 6.5g).
Pasta (cooked)
Cooked pasta contains roughly a third of the calories of dry pasta because of water absorption — easy to misjudge when tracking. It provides slow-releasing carbohydrates and modest protein. Whole-wheat varieties add 5–7g more fiber per 100g and have a lower glycemic impact.
View Pasta (cooked) nutrition →Sweet Potato (Baked)
Sweet potatoes are an excellent source of beta-carotene, which the body converts to vitamin A. They are rich in fiber, vitamin C, manganese, and potassium. Their complex carbohydrates provide sustained energy, and their lower glycemic index compared to regular potatoes makes them a popular choice in balanced diets.
View Sweet Potato (Baked) nutrition →Track Pasta (cooked) & Sweet Potato (Baked) in Kairo
Scan your food with AI and automatically track calories and macros. No manual entry needed.
Try Kairo for free