Cucumber vs Kale
Calories, macronutrients and nutrition facts compared side by side (per 100g).
Nutrition Comparison
| Per 100g | Cucumber | Kale |
|---|---|---|
| Calories | 15kcal | 35kcal |
| Protein | 0.7g | 2.9g |
| Carbs | 3.6g | 4.4g |
| Fat | 0.1g | 1.5g |
| Fiber | 0.5g | 4.1g |
| Sugar | 1.7g | 1g |
| Sodium | 2mg | 53mg |
Green marks the more favorable value (fewer calories/sugar/sodium, more protein/fiber).
Key Takeaways
- Cucumber has 20 fewer calories per 100g than Kale (133% less).
- Kale delivers more protein (2.9g vs 0.7g per 100g).
- Kale has more fiber (4.1g vs 0.5g).
- Cucumber contains less fat (0.1g vs 1.5g).
- Kale has less sugar (1g vs 1.7g).
Cucumber
Cucumber is over 95% water and provides minimal calories — perfect for hydration-focused, high-volume eating. Despite the low calorie count, it supplies vitamin K and small amounts of magnesium and potassium. The skin contains most of the fiber.
View Cucumber nutrition →Kale
Kale is one of the most nutrient-dense foods on the planet. A 100g serving covers over 200% of daily vitamin K, 130% of vitamin C, and substantial vitamin A — all for just 35 calories. Its sulforaphane and glucosinolates have been widely studied for cardiovascular and detoxification support.
View Kale nutrition →Track Cucumber & Kale in Kairo
Scan your food with AI and automatically track calories and macros. No manual entry needed.
Try Kairo for free